Nonrivalness, Subjectivity and Capital – An Overview of the Austrian Theory of Club Goods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62374/99nf5w70Keywords:
Club goods, Capital, Austrian SchoolAbstract
According to neoclassical economic theory, club goods would be underproduced by the market in the absence of a monopoly of force capable of coercing every able member of society to contribute to their provision. By applying both the methodological tools developed by the Austrian School of Economics and the tools used to investigate the institutional robustness of various systems of political economy, I shall argue, first, that the neoclassical characteristics of club goods are based on a number of false assumptions or unacceptable oversimplifications, and second, that even if they were correct as stated, they would not establish the desirability of the existence of a monopoly of force due to the existence of a more efficient, purely market-based alternative. Then I shall apply the results of my argument to the issue of the provision of law and defense, which appears to lend itself particularly well to being a promising case study in this context.
References
Arnold, R. A. (2004). Economics. Mason, OH: South-Western.
Arrow, K. (1969). The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Nonmarket Allocation. In The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditure: The PPB System, Vol. 1, U.S. Joint Economic Committee, 91st Congress, 1st Session. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Arrow, K. (1974). Limited Knowledge and Economic Analysis. American Economic Review, 64(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.1.1
Ayers, R. M., & Collinge, R. A. (2004). Economics: Explore and Apply. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bator, F. M. (1958). The Anatomy of Market Failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351-379. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882231
Baumol, W. J. (1961). Review of Politics, Economics and Welfare. In Economic Theory and Operations Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Berglas, E. (1976). On the Theory of Clubs. American Economic Review, 66, 116-121.
Blankart, C. B. (1994). Club Governments versus Representative Governments. Constitutional Political Economy, 5(3), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393261
Block, W. (1975). On Value Freedom in Economics. American Economist, 19, 38-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943457501900106
Boettke, P. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2004). Liberalism, Socialism, and Robust Political Economy. Journal of Markets & Morality, 7(1), 99-111.
Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1894/5). The Ultimate Standard of Value. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 5, 149-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629400500201
Brownstein, B. (1980). Pareto Optimality, External Benefits and Public Goods: A Subjectivist Approach. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 4(1), 93-106.
Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An Economic Theory of Clubs. Economica, 32, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2552442
Buchanan, J. (1969). Cost and Choice. Chicago: Markam Publishing Co.
Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buchanan, J. M., & Flowers, M. R. (1975). The Public Finances: An Introductory Textbook (4th ed.). Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.
Bush, W., & Mayer, L. (1974). Some implications of anarchy for the distribution of property. Journal of Economic Theory, 8, 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(74)90018-0
Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1986). The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cowen, T. (1992). Law as a Public Good: The Economics of Anarchy. Economics and Philosophy, 8, 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100003060
De Jasay, A. (1989). Social contract, free ride: A study of the public goods problem. New York: Oxford University Press.
Demsetz, H. (1964). The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights. Journal of Law and Economics, 7(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1086/466596
Demsetz, H. (1970). The Private Production of Public Goods. Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1086/466695
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review, 35, 519-530.
Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2002). Competition as a Discovery Procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(3), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-002-1029-0
Head, J. G., & Shoup, C. S. (1969). Public Goods, Private Goods, and Ambiguous Goods. Economic Journal, 79, 567-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230383
Head, J. G. (1972). Public goods: The polar case. In R. M. Bird & J. G. Head (Eds.), Modern fiscal issues: Essays in honour of Carl. S. Shoup (pp. 7-16). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442631984-003
Herbener, J. (1996). Calculation and the Question of Arithmetic. Review of Austrian Economics, 9(1), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101889
Herbener, J. (1997). The Pareto Rule and Welfare Economics. Review of Austrian Economics, 10(1), 70-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538144
Hill, P. J. (1997). An Economist's Surprise. Liberty, 10(3), 69-70.
Hoppe, H.-H. (1989). Fallacies of the Public Goods Theory and the Production of Security. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 9(1), 27-46.
Hummel, J. R. (1990). National Goods Versus Public Goods: Defense, Disarmament, and Free Riders. Review of Austrian Economics, 4, 88-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426365
Kim, O., & Walker, M. (1984). The Free Rider Problem: Experimental Evidence. Public Choice, 43, 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137902
Kirzner, I. M. (1992). The Meaning of Market Process. London: Routledge.
Lachmann, L. M. (1986). The Market as an Economic Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lange, O. (1936/7). On the Economic Theory of Socialism. Review of Economic Studies, 4, 53-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967660
Lavoie, D. (1985). Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leach, J. (2003). A Course in Public Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754180
Leeson, P. T., & Subrick, J. R. (2006). Robust Political Economy. Review of Austrian Economics, 19(2-3), 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-006-7342-7
Machaj, M. (2007). Market Socialism and the Property Problem. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 10(4), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-007-9027-x
Malkin, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1991). Why the traditional distinction between public and private goods should be abandoned. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 4(3), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692891003004001
McNutt, P. (1999). Public Goods and Club Goods. In B. Bouckaert & G. De Geest (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Edward Elgar Publishers, UK and University of Ghent, Belgium.
Mises, L. (1920) [1990]. Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Mises, L. (1966). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Mueller, D. C. (1996). Constitutional Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195095883.001.0001
Musgrave, P.B., & Musgrave, R.A. (1980). Public Finance in Theory and Practice. London: McGraw Hill.
Olson, M. (1971) [1965]. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
Reynolds, M. O. (1998). Impossibility of Socialist Economy, or, A Cat Cannot Swim the Atlantic Ocean. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(2), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-998-1007-2
Roemer, J. E. (1994). A Future for Socialism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329294022004003
Rothbard, M. (1956). Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics. In M. Sennholz (Ed.), On Freedom and Free Enterprise: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises (pp. 224-262). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Rothbard, M. (1962) [1970]. Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles. Los Angeles: Nash Publishing.
Rothbard, M. (1973). Value Implications of Economic Theory. The American Economist, 17, 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943457301700105
Rothbard, M. (1981). The Myth of Neutral Taxation. Cato Journal, 1, 519-564.
Rothbard, M. (1991). The End of Socialism and the Calculation Debate Revisited. Review of Austrian Economics, 5(2), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426928
Salerno, J. (1990). Postscript: Why A Socialist Economy is "Impossible". In L. Mises, Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895
Samuelson, P. A., & Temin, P. (1976). Economics (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sandler, T. (1997). Global Challenges: An Approach to Environmental, Political, and Economic Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174886
Sandmo, A. (2000). The Public Economics of the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019829798X.001.0001
Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). Markets, Market Failures, and Development. American Economic Review, 79(2), 197-203. https://doi.org/10.3386/w2961
Stiglitz, J. E. (1994). Whither Socialism?. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Taylor, F. M. (1929). The Guidance of Production in a Socialist State. American Economic Review, 19(1), 1-8.
Willis, J. (2002). Explorations in Microeconomics. Redding, CA: North West Publishing.
Wohlgemuth, M. (1997). Has John Roemer Resurrected Market Socialism? Independent Review, 2(2), 201-224.
Published
Issue
Section
License
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.